From Bible Encyclopedia
(6) לטאה, leṭā'āh, English Versions of the Bible “lizard”; compare Arabic laṭa', “to cling to the ground”; Only in Leviticus 11:30, as rendering of Hebrew letaah, so called from its “hiding.” Supposed to be the Lacerta gecko or fan-foot lizard, from the toes of which poison exudes. See Chameleon.
Since (1), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) occur as names of animals only in this passage, and as the philological evidence available is in most cases not very convincing, their determination is difficult and uncertain. the Revised Version margin to “gecko” (Leviticus 11:30) has “Words of uncertain meaning, but probably denoting four kinds of lizards.”
2. Lizards of Palestine:
Among the many lizards of Palestine, the monitor and thorny-tailed lizard are remarkable for their size, and the chameleon for its striking appearance and habits. On etymological grounds, kōah, the King James Version “chameleon,” the Revised Version (British and American) “land-crocodile,” Septuagint chamailéōn, has been taken to be the monitor; cābh, the King James Version “tortoise,” the Revised Version (British and American) “great lizard,” Septuagint krokódeilos chersaíos, to be the thorny-tailed lizard; and tinshemeth, the King James Version “mole,” the Revised Version (British and American) “chameleon,” Septuagint aspálax, to be the chameleon. On the same grounds, ḥōledh, English Versions of the Bible “weasel,” Septuagint galḗ, might be the mole-rat.
The commonest lizard of Palestine is the rough-tailed agama, Agama stellio, Arabic ḥirdaun or ḥirdaun, which is everywhere in evidence, running about on the ground, rocks or walls, frequently lying still basking in the sun, or bobbing its head up and down in the peculiar manner that it has.
The gecko, Ptyodactylus lobatus, is common in houses. By means of adhesive disks on the under sides of its toes, it clings with ease to smooth walls which other lizards cannot scale. Although perfectly harmless, it is believed to be poisonous, and is much feared. It is called abu-brais, “father of leprosy,” either on account of its supposed poisonous qualities or because it has a semi-transparent and sickly appearance, being of a whitish-yellow color with darker spots. It utters a little cry, which may be the reason why the Revised Version (British and American) has “gecko” for 'ănāḳāh; the King James Version has “ferret.”
Various species of the genus Lacerta and its allies, the true lizards, may always be found searching for insects on trees and walls. They are scaly, like all lizards, but are relatively smooth and are prettily colored, and are the most attractive members of the group which are found in the country. They are called by the Arabs saḳḳaiyeh or shammûseh.
The skinks include Scincus officinalis, and allied species. Arabic saḳanḳûr = Greek skígkos (skínkos). They are smooth, light-colored lizards, and are found in sandy places. They cannot climb, but they run and burrow in the sand with remarkable rapidity. The dried body of Scincus officinalis is an important feature of the primitive oriental materia medica, and may be found in the shops (officinae) of the old-style apothecaries.
Semāmīth (Proverbs 30:28, the King James Version “spider,” the Revised Version (British and American) “lizard”) is one of the “four things which are little ... but ... exceeding wise.” the Revised Version (British and American) reads:
“The lizard taketh hold with her hands,
Yet is she in kings' palaces.”
The Septuagint has καλαβώτης, kalabṓtēs, which according to Liddell and Scott = ἀσκαλαβώτης, askalabṓtēs, “a spotted lizard.” There is no other lizard which fits this passage as does the gecko. If Gesenius is correct in deriving semāmīth from the root sāmam (compare Arabic samma, “to poison”), we have another reason for making this identification, in which case we must rule out the rendering of the Revised Version margin, “Thou canst seize with thy hands.”
For none of the names in Leviticus 11:29, Leviticus 11:30 have we as many data for identification as for semāmīth. For leṭā'āh, English Versions of the Bible “lizard,” the Septuagint has χαλαβώτης, chalabṓtēs, which is another variant of askalabṓtēs. If we follow the Septuagint, therefore, we should render leṭa'ah “gecko.” Tristram quotes Bochart as drawing an argument that leṭā'āh is “gecko” from the Arabic laṭa, “to cling to the ground.” This view is at least in accordance with Septuagint. It is of course untenable if 'ănāḳāh is “gecko,” but (see Ferret) the writer thinks it quite possible that 'ănāḳāh may mean the shrew or field-mouse, which is also in agreement with Septuagint. It will not do to follow Septuagint in all cases, but it is certainly safe to do so in the absence of a clear indication to the contrary.
There seems to be little evidence available for deciding the identity of ḥōmeṭ, the King James Version “snail,” the Revised Version (British and American) “sand-lizard.” Septuagint has σαῦρα, saúra, and Vulgate (Jerome's Latin Bible, 390-405 AD) lacerta, both words for lizard. Gesenius refers the word to an obsolete ḥāmaṭ, “to bow down,” “to lie upon the ground.” Tristram, NHB, cites Bochart as referring to a word meaning “sand.” Hence, perhaps the Revised Version (British and American) “sand-lizard.” If by this is meant the skink, there is no inherent improbability in the identification.
We have thus more or less tentatively assigned various words of the list to the monitor, the thorny-tailed lizard, the chameleon, the gecko and the skink, but we have done nothing with the rough-tailed agama and the Lacertae, or true lizards, which are the commonest lizards of Palestine, and this fact must be reckoned against the correctness of the assignment. The translation of the Revised Version (British and American) has this to commend it, that it gives two small mammals followed by six lizards, and is therefore to that extent systematic. It is, however, neither guided in all cases by etymological considerations, nor does it follow Septuagint.
As none of the etymological arguments is very cogent, the writer can see no harm in consistently following Septuagint, understanding for
(1) galē, weasel or pole-cat; for
(2) mús, mouse; for
(3) krokodeilos chersaios, some large lizard, either the monitor or the thorny-tailed lizard; for
(4) mūgalḗ, shrew or field-mouse; for
(5) chamaileon, chameleon; for
(6) chalabōtēs, gecko; for
(7) saura, a Lacerta or true lizard; for
(8) aspalax, mole-rat.
On the other hand, if etymological considerations are to be taken into account and Septuagint abandoned when it conflicts with them we might have
(1) ḥōledh, mole-rat;
(2) ‛akhbār, mouse;
(3) cābh, thorny-tailed lizard;
(4) 'anāḳāh, field-mouse;
(5) kōah, monitor;
(6) leṭā'āh, gecko;
(7) ḥōmeṭ, skink;
(8) tinshemeth, chameleon.
Neither of these lists has the systematic arrangement of that of the Revised Version (British and American), but we must remember that the Biblical writers were not zoologists, as is seen in the inclusion of the bat among birds (Leviticus 11:19; Deuteronomy 14:18), and of the hare and coney among ruminants (Leviticus 11:5, Leviticus 11:6; Deuteronomy 14:7).