From Bible Encyclopedia
zed-ḗ-kī´a (צדקיּהוּ, cidhḳīyāhū, צדקיּה, cidhḳīyāh, “Yah my righteousness” or "Righteousness of YHWH"; Σεδεκιά, Sedekiá, Σεδεκίας, Sedekías):
(1) The son of Chenaanah, a false prophet in the days of Ahab (1 Kings 22:11, 1 Kings 22:24; 2 Chronicles 18:10, 2 Chronicles 18:23). Zedekiah was apparently the leader and spokesman of the 400 prophets attached to the court in Samaria whom Ahab summoned in response to Jehoshaphat's request that a prophet of Yahweh should be consulted concerning the projected campaign against Ramoth-Gilead. In order the better to impress his audience Zedekiah produced iron horns, and said to Ahab, “With these shalt thou push the Syrians, until they be consumed.” He also endeavored to weaken the influence of Micaiah ben Imlah upon the kings by asking ironically, “Which way went the Spirit of Yahweh from me to speak unto thee?”
In Josephus (Ant., VIII, xv, 4) there is an interesting rearrangement and embellishment of the Biblical narrative. There Zedekiah is represented as arguing that since Micaiah contradicts Elijah's prediction as to the place of Ahab's death, he must be regarded as a false prophet. Then, smiting his opponent, he prayed that if he were in the wrong his right hand might forthwith be withered. Ahab, seeing that no harm befell the hand that had smitten Micaiah, was convinced; whereupon Zedekiah completed his triumph by the incident of the horns mentioned above.
(2) The son of Maaseiah (Jeremiah 29:21-23). A false prophet who, in association with another, Ahab by name, prophesied among the exiles in Babylon, and foretold an early return from captivity. Jeremiah sternly denounced them, not only for their false and reckless predictions, but also for their foul and adulterous lives, and declared that their fate at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar should become proverbial in Israel.
(4) One of the officials who sealed the renewed covenant (Nehemiah 10:1, the King James Version “Zid-Kijah”). The fact that his name is coupled with Nehemiah's suggests that he was a person of importance. But nothing further is known of him.
(5) The last king of Judah (see following article Zedekiah (2)). He was the third son of Josiah, and his mother's name was Hamutal, the daughter of Jeremiah of Libnah, and hence he was the brother of Jehoahaz (2 Kings 23:31; 2 Kings 24:17, 2 Kings 24:18). His original name was Mattaniah; but when Nebuchadnezzar placed him on the throne as the successor to Jehoiachin he changed his name to Zedekiah. The prophet Jeremiah was his counsellor, yet “he did evil in the sight of the Lord” (2 Kings 24:19, 2 Kings 24:20; Jeremiah 52:2, Jeremiah 52:3). He ascended the throne at the age of twenty-one years. The kingdom was at that time tributary to Nebuchadnezzar; but, despite the strong remonstrances of Jeremiah and others, as well as the example of Jehoiachin, he threw off the yoke of Babylon, and entered into an alliance with Hophra, king of Egypt. This brought up Nebuchadnezzar, “with all his host” (2 Kings 25:1), against Jerusalem. During this siege, which lasted about eighteen months, “every worst woe befell the devoted city, which drank the cup of God's fury to the dregs” (2 Kings 25:3; Lamentations 4:4, Lamentations 4:5, Lamentations 4:10). The city was plundered and laid in ruins. Zedekiah and his followers, attempting to escape, were made captive and taken to Riblah. There, after seeing his own children put to death, his own eyes were put out, and, being loaded with chains, he was carried captive (588 BC) to Babylon (2 Kings 25:1-7; 2 Chronicles 36:12; Jeremiah 32:4, Jeremiah 32:5; Jeremiah 34:2, Jeremiah 34:3; Jeremiah 39:1-7; Jeremiah 52:4-11; Ezekiel 12:12), where he remained a prisoner, how long is unknown, to the day of his death.
After the fall of Jerusalem, Nebuzaradan was sent to carry out its complete destruction. The city was razed to the ground. Only a small number of vinedressers and husbandman were permitted to remain in the land (Jeremiah 52:16). Gedaliah, with a Chaldean guard stationed at Mizpah, ruled over Judah (2 Kings 25:22, 2 Kings 25:24; Jeremiah 40:1, Jeremiah 40:2, Jeremiah 40:5, Jeremiah 40:6).
(צדקיּהוּ, cidhḳīyāhū, “Yah my righteousness”; name changed from Mattaniah (מתּניה, mattanyāh, “gift of Yah”; Σεδεκίας, Sedekías):
I. Sources for His Reign and Time.
Neither of the accounts in 2 Kings 24:18 through 25:7 and 2 Chronicles 36:11-21 refers, as is the usual custom, to state annals; these ran out with the reign of Jehoiakim. The history in 2 Kings is purely scribal and historianic in tone; 2 Chronicles, especially as it goes on to the captivity, is more fervid and homiletic. Both have a common prophetic origin; and indeed Jeremiah 52, which is put as an appendix to the book of his prophecy, tells the story of the reign and subsequent events, much as does 2 Kings, but in somewhat fuller detail.
Two prophets are watching with keen eyes the progress of this reign, both with the poignant sense that the end of the Judean state is imminent: Jeremiah in Jerusalem and Ezekiel, one of the captives in the deportation with Jehoiachin, in Babylon. Dates are supplied with the prophecies of both: Jeremiah's numbered from the beginning of the reign and not consecutive; Ezekiel's numbered from the beginning of the first captivity, and so coinciding with Jeremiah's. From these dated prophecies the principal ideas are to be formed of the real inwardness of the time and the character of the administration. The prophetic passages identifiable with this reign, counted by its years, are: Jeremiah 24:1-10, after the deportation of Jehoiachin (Jeconiah) - the inferior classes left with Zedekiah (compare Ezekiel 11:15; Ezekiel 17:12-14); Jer 27 through 29, beginning of reign - false hopes of return of captives and futile diplomacies with neighboring nations; Jeremiah 51:59, Jeremiah 51:4 year - Zedekiah's visit to Babylon; Ezekiel 4 through 7, 5th year - symbolic prophecies of the coming end of Judah; Ezekiel 8 through 12, 6th year - quasi-clairvoyant view of the idolatrous corruptions in Jerusalem; Ezekiel 17:11-21, same year - Zedekiah's treacherous intrigues with Egypt; Ezekiel 21:18-23, Ezekiel 21:7 year - Nebuchadnezzar casting a divination to determine his invasion of Judah; Jeremiah 21:1-14, undated but soon after - deputation from the king to the prophet inquiring Yahweh's purpose; Jeremiah 34:1-7, undated - the prophet's word to the king while Nebuchadnezzar's invasion is still among the cities of the land; Ezekiel 24:1, Ezekiel 24:2, Ezekiel 24:9 year - telepathic awareness of the beginning of the siege, synchronistic with Jeremiah 39:1-10; 2 Kings 25:1-7; Jeremiah 37; 38, undated, but soon after - prophecies connected with the temporary raising of the siege and the false faith of the ruling classes; Jeremiah 32, 10th year - Jeremiah's redemption of his Anathoth property in the midst of siege, and the good presage of the act; Jeremiah 39, 11th year - annalistic account of the breaching of the city wall and the flight and eventual fate of the king. A year and a half later Ezekiel (Ezekiel 33:21, Ezekiel 33:22) hears the news from a fugitive.
II. The Administration of the Last King of Judah.
1. The Situation:
When Nebuchadnezzar took away Jehoiachin, and with him all the men of weight and character (see under Jehoiachin), his object was plain: to leave a people so broken in resources and spirit that they would not be moved to rebellion (see Ezekiel 17:14). But this measure of his effected a segmentation of the nation which the prophets immediately recognized as virtually separating out their spiritual “remnant” to go to Babylon, while the worldly and inferior grades remained in Jerusalem. These are sharply distinguished from each other by Jeremiah in his parable of the Figs (Jeremiah 24:1-10), published soon after the first deportation. The people that were left were probably of the same sort that Zephaniah described a few years before, those who had “settled on their lees” (Zephaniah 1:12), a godless and inert element in religion and state. Their religious disposition is portrayed by Ezekiel in Zedekiah's 6th year, in his clairvoyant vision of the uncouth temple rites, as it were a cesspool of idolatry, maintained under the pretext that Yahweh had forsaken the land (see Ezekiel 8). Clearly these were not of the prophetic stamp. It was over such an inferior grade of people that Zedekiah was appointed to a thankless and tragic reign.
2. The Parvenu Temper:
For a people so raw and inexperienced in administration the prophets recognized one clear duty: to keep the oath which they had given to Nebuchadnezzar (see Ezekiel 17:14-16). But they acted like men intoxicated with new power; their accession to property and unwonted position turned their heads. Soon after the beginning of the reign we find Jeremiah giving emphatic warning both to his nation and the ambassadors of neighboring nations against a rebellious coalition (Jeremiah 27 mistakenly dated in the 4th year of Jehoiakim; compare Jeremiah 27:3, Jeremiah 27:12); he has also an encounter with prophets who, in contradiction of his consistent message, predict the speedy restoration of Jehoiachin and the temple vessels. The king's visit to Babylon (Jeremiah 51:59) was probably made to clear himself of complicity in treasonable plots. Their evil genius, Egypt, however, is busy with the too headstrong upstart rulers; and about the middle of the reign Zedekiah breaks his covenant with his over-lord and, relying on Egypt, embarks on rebellion. The prophetic view of this movement is, that it is a moral outrage; it is breaking a sworn word (Ezekiel 17:15-19), and thus falsifying the truth of Yahweh.
This act of rebellion against the king of Babylon was not the only despite done to “Yahweh's oath.” Its immediate effect, of course, was to precipitate the invasion of the Chaldean forces, apparently from Riblah on the Orontes, where for several years Nebuchadnezzar had his headquarters. Ezekiel has a striking description of his approach, halting to determine by arrow divination whether to proceed against Judah or Ammon (Ezekiel 21:18-23). Before laying siege to Jerusalem, however, he seems to have spent some time reducing outlying fortresses (compare Jeremiah 34:1-7); and during the suspense of this time the king sent a deputation to Jeremiah to inquire whether Yahweh would not do “according to all his wondrous works,” evidently hoping for some such miraculous deliverance as had taken place in the time of Sennacherib (Jeremiah 21:1 ff). The prophet gives his uniform answer, that the city must fall; advising the house of David also to “execute justice and righteousness.” Setting about this counsel as if they would bribe Yahweh's favor, the king then entered into an agreement with his people to free all their Hebrew bond-slaves (Jeremiah 34:8-10), and sent back a deputation to the prophet entreating his intercession (Jeremiah 37:3), as if, having bribed Yahweh, they might work some kind of a charm on the divine will. Nebuchadnezzar had meanwhile invested the city; but just then the Egyptian army approached to aid Judah, and the Babylonian king raised the siege long enough to drive the Egyptians back to their own land; at which, judging that Yahweh had interfered as of old, the people caused their slaves to return to their bondage (Jeremiah 34:11). This treachery called forth a trenchant prophecy from Jeremiah, predicting not only the speedy return of the Chaldean army (Jeremiah 37:6-10), but the captivity of the king and the destruction of the city (Jeremiah 34:17-22). It was during this temporary cessation of the siege that Jeremiah, attempting to go to Anathoth to redeem his family property, was seized on the pretext of deserting to the enemy, and put in prison (Jeremiah 37:11-15).
4. Character of the King:
During the siege, which was soon resumed, Zedekiah's character, on its good and bad sides, was revealed through his frequent contact with the prophet Jeremiah. The latter was a prisoner most of the time; and the indignities which he suffered, and which the king heedlessly allowed, show how the prophet's word and office had fallen in respect (compare the treatment he received, Jeremiah 26:16-19 with Jeremiah 37:15; Jeremiah 38:6). The king, however, was not arrogant and heartless like his brother Jehoiakim; he was weak and without consistent principles; besides, he was rather helpless and timid in the hands of his headstrong officials (compare Jeremiah 38:5, Jeremiah 38:24-26). His regard for the word of prophecy was rather superstitious than religious: while the prophet's message and counsel were uniformly consistent, he could not bring himself to follow the will of Yahweh, and seemed to think that Yahweh could somehow be persuaded to change his plans (see Jeremiah 37:17; Jeremiah 38:14-16). His position was an exceedingly difficult one; but even so, he had not the firmness, the wisdom, the consistency for it.
In his siege of the city Nebuchadnezzar depended mainly on starving it into surrender; and we cannot withhold a measure of admiration for a body of defenders who, in spite of the steadily decreasing food supply and the ravages of pestilence, held the city for a year and a half.
5. His Fate:
During this time Jeremiah's counsel was well known: the counsel of surrender, and the promise that so they could save their lives (Jeremiah 21:9; Jeremiah 38:2). It was for this, indeed, that he was imprisoned, on the plea that he “weakened the hands” of the defenders; and it was due to the mercy of a foreign slave that he did not suffer death (Jeremiah 38:7-9). At length in the 11th year of Zedekiah's reign, just as the supply of food in the city was exhausted, the Chaldean army effected a breach in the wall, and the king of Babylon with his high officials came in and sat in the middle gate. Zedekiah and his men of war, seeing this, fled by night, taking the ill-advised route by the road to Jericho; were pursued and captured in the plains of the Jordan; and Zedekiah was brought before the king of Babylon at Riblah. After putting to death Zedekiah's sons and the nobles of Judah before his eyes, the king of Babylon then put out the eyes of Zedekiah and carried him captive to Babylon, where, it is uncertain how long after, he died. Jeremiah had prophesied that he would die in peace and have a state mourning (Jeremiah 34:4, Jeremiah 34:5); Ezekiel's prophecy of his doom is enigmatic: “I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there” (Ezekiel 12:13).
6. Doom of the Nation:
The cruelly devised humiliation of the king was only an episode in the tragic doom of the city and nation. Nebuchadnezzar was not minded to leave so stubborn and treacherous a fortress on his path of conquest toward Egypt. A month after the event at Riblah his deputy, Nebuzaradan, entered upon the reduction of the city: burning the temple and all the principal houses, breaking down the walls, carrying away the temple treasures still unpillaged, including the bronze work which was broken into scrap metal, and deporting the people who were left after the desperate resistance and those who had voluntarily surrendered. The religious and state officials were taken to Riblah and put to death. “So,” the historian concludes, “Judah was carried away captive out of his land” (Jeremiah 52:27). This was in 586 BC. This, however, was only the political date of the Babylonian exile, the retributive limit for those leavings of Israel who for 11 years had played an insincere game of administration and failed. The prophetic date, from which Ezekiel reckons the years of exile, and from which the prophetic eye is kept on the fortunes and character of the people who are to be redeemed, was 597 BC, when Jehoiachin's long imprisonment began and when the flower of Israel, transplanted to a foreign home, began its term of submission to the word and will of Yahweh. It was this saving element in Israel who still had a recognized king and a promised future. By both Jeremiah and Ezekiel, Zedekiah was regarded not as Yahweh's anointed but as the one whom Nebuchadnezzar “had made king” (Jeremiah 37:1; Ezekiel 17:16), “the king that sitteth upon the throne of David” (Jeremiah 29:16). The real last king of Judah was Jehoiachin; Ezekiel's title for Zedekiah is “prince” (Ezekiel 12:10).